武汉文都欢迎您!
  • 群名称:2020文都考研交流2群
    群   号:174073601

400-099-1860

全国统一24小时咨询服务热线

2015考研英语:何凯文老师每天一句(263)

来源:武汉文都 更新时间:2019-08-06 16:28:02

既然冲刺的时候到了,那我也必须给力啊,给了作文句子,该给阅读题目了哦。必须接近真题啊:)怎么样,体贴吧:)看看大家做的怎么样哦:)

The framers of Americas constitution knew nothing about mobilephones, but they knew athing or two about unreasonable searches. In Riley vs California, the SupremeCourtconsidered whether the police may,without a warrant, search digitalinformation on a cellphone seized from anindividual who has been arrested.Unanimously onJune 25th, the justices said no, or, to be more precise, veryrarely.

David Riley, a member of the Bloods streetgang who was sentenced to15 years to life for attempted murder, and BrimaWurie, sentenced to 262 monthson a drug charge, will be happy to hear this.Except in true emergencies wheresearching a mobile phone could, say, avert aterrorist attack, police pryingwithout a warrant violates the Fourth Amendments bar on unreasonablesearches, the justices decided. Since both Riley and Wuries convictions werebased on evidence gleaned from such searches, theywill be overturned.

1.The reason why the case of David has thepossibility of being invalidated is that

(A) The evidence associated withhisconviction violates the Fourth Amendment.

(B) The conviction will be overturnedasjustices decided in Riley vs Californiacase.

(C) His charge of attempted murder is notbasedon true emergencies when police prying.

(D) The way to attain evidenceisunconstitutional according to an unanimous decision.

就是D

 

 


 


免责声明:本站所提供的内容均来源于网友提供或网络搜集,由本站编辑整理,仅供个人研究、交流学习使用,不涉及商业盈利目的。如涉及版权问题,请联系本站管理员予以更改或删除。