400-099-1860

这个题目应该就是今年的真题！
　　
　　为了遏制空气污染，美国国会通过了清洁空气法案。美国环境保护署为强制执行法案公布的法规却引起了一些州的不满，认为保护署以法案之名却违背了法案的条文，越权管理。最高法院如何判决！
　　
　　For Justice Antonin Scalia, however, that is “a silly way to read” the law. His three fellow conservatives seem to concur. The Court’s four liberals appear to accept the EPA’s reading. That leaves Justice Anthony Kennedy as the swing vote, as usual.
　　
　　Mr Kennedy grilled both sides, but he may have tipped his hand. When Mr Verrilli argued that the agency need not analyze costs and benefits before deciding to curb a pollutant, Mr Kennedy raised an eyebrow. “But at that point,” he said, “the game is over.” A decision is expected by summer.
　　
　　What can be inferred from this paragraph?
　　
　　(A) Justice Anthony Kennedy may disagree with conservatives.
　　
　　(B) Three conservatives in the Court may not agree with Antonin Scalia.
　　
　　(C) Mr Verrilli may think the game is over when the rule has been settled.
　　
　　(D) Liberals in the Court may oppose the statement of Mr Verrilli.
　　
　　推荐一下我的时文精析，这个题目来自我的时文精析的命题，尤其是2017版的文章，选的很好，绝对的良心制作！
　　
　　优惠的正版销售链接： https://detail.tmall.com/item.htm?id=520361118831&spm=a310v.4.88.1

>>扫一扫，考研资讯随身走！