400-099-1860

　EVEN a non-decision by the Supreme Court can cause waves. On October 5th, as part of its routine disclosure of upcoming cases, the Court declined to take up a petition related to insider trading. The Justice Department had wanted it to overturn an appeals court’s decision in December to throw out the conviction of two hedge-fund managers. That means the decision will now stand, setting an important legal precedent.
　　
　　What can we infer from this paragraph?
　　
　　(A)  The Court echoed the Justice Department to decline the petition.
　　
　　(B)  The Court declined a petition  made by the Justice Department.
　　
　　(C)  The Court overturned the petition of appeals court's conviction.
　　
　　(D)  The Court had set an important legal precedent with a non decision.

>>扫一扫，考研资讯随身走！