400-099-1860

　　今天的句子：

　　The humanities’ supposed lack of obvious vocational pathways is in fact a strength in an economy where flexibility and entrepreneurship are prized, while the perception of lower employability is not borne out by facts – 88% of Shape (social sciences, humanities and the arts for people and the economy) graduates were employed in 2017 (compared with 89% for Stem).

　　思考题：

　　It can be learned from the passage that _____

　　(A) humanities’ supposed low employability lacks factual support.

　　(B) Shape graduates enjoy the higher employability than Stem students.

　　(C) lack of obvious vocational pathways underlies humanities’ inferiority.

　　(D) humanities’ students are dearth of the flexibility and entrepreneurship

　　词汇突破：

　　The humanities’人文社会科学

　　vocational pathways 职业路径

　　in fact 实际上

　　a strength 优势

　　flexibility 灵活性

　　entrepreneurship 创业精神

　　prized 重视

　　perception 看法和认知

　　employability 就业潜力

　　borne out by facts 得到事实支持

　　STEM是科学(Science)，技术(Technology)，工程(Engineering)，数学(Mathematics)四门学科英文首字母的缩写

　　句子解析：

　　The humanities’ supposed lack of obvious vocational pathways is in fact a strength in an economy where flexibility and entrepreneurship are prized, while(然而) the perception of lower employability is not borne out by facts– 88% of Shape (social sciences, humanities and the arts for people and the economy) graduates were employed in 2017 (compared with 89% for Stem).(同位语解释事实)

　　参考译文：人文学科的所谓短板——缺少明晰的职业前途——实际上在这个青睐灵活性和创业精神的经济中是优势，而且认为人文学科就业潜力较低的看法并未得到事实佐证——2017年，人文社科(社会科学、人文、艺术和经济)毕业生的就业率为88%(而理工科为89%)。

　　思考题解析：

　　It can be learned from the passage that _____

　　从文章中我们可以了解到：

　　(A) humanities’ supposed low employment rate lacks factual support

　　(A)人文学科假设的低就业率缺乏事实支持

　　对应原文：

　　the perception of lower employability is not borne out by facts

　　明确说了缺乏事实依据。

　　即使后面一个88%一个89%

　　人文社科的确实低一个点，但是原文说了不具备事实依据，也就意味着作者认定这个一个点的差别反而说了人文社科学生的就业率不算低。所以正确!

　　即使你再不爽，这个也是最佳的了!

　　咱错了就认错就好。

　　(B) Shape graduates enjoy the higher employability than Stem students.

　　Shape毕业生享有比stem学生更高的就业能力。

　　说了shape的不低，但是没有说比stem 高啊!

　　错!而且数据也不支持啊!

　　(C) lack of obvious vocational pathways underlies humanities’ inferiority.

　　(C)缺乏明显的职业道路是人文学科劣势的根源。

　　The humanities’ supposed lack of obvious vocational pathways is in fact a strength

　　所谓的缺乏明显的职业道路实际是一个优势(strength)!

　　所以错!而且错的很明显!

　　(D) humanities’ students are dearth of the flexibility and entrepreneurship

　　人文学科学生缺乏灵活性和创业精神

　　这就是拼多多了!

　　错!没有的事，你就是没有好好切分句子!

　　武汉文都考研为考研党们及时发布新鲜、有料且干货满满的备考资料及考研资讯，助征战研究生考试的考生们一臂之力。关注武汉文都考研官网【wh.wendu.com】，持续了解更多考研相关内容。研途漫漫，名校之约，文都考研，今年我们一研为定，明年定为研一!